The Anatomy of a Construction Dispute Stage 2- Increase the Heat

Originally posted 2015-01-19 09:00:35. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Construction Company

Construction Company (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Last week we discussed the groundwork and circumstances of a construction claim. This week’s post will discuss the next steps, hopefully short of full blown arbitration or litigation that you, as a construction company, can pursue presuming your claim has been properly preserved.

If your contract requires certain steps such as informal resolution attempts or other items, these are the first things that must be done while still preserving your rights to pursue all remedies available. Instituting such contractually required resolution steps can and should be the first “notch” on the dial of increased pressure on the Owner, General Contractor or possibly Subcontractor against whom you have a claim.

Should these not work, or should certain deadlines, whether they be put in place by your state’s mechanic’s lien statutes, the Miller or Little Miller Act, or a private bond, become short, then certain other steps can and should be taken with the assistance of an experienced construction lawyer. Each of these, depending on the circumstance of your claim, could possibly lead to payment short of a full blown law suit.

Should your claim for payment relate to a private project on which you have supplied labor or materials that increase the value of the real estate, you likely have mechanic’s lien rights. In my home state of Virginia, you will need to take into account your last date of work and properly apply the 90 day and 150 day rules before recording such a lien. Often your recording of a lien that meets the strict statutory requirements at the very least leads to some chaos and negotiations and at most leads to payment with some other possible outcomes (such as the replacement of the lien with a bond).

If you have a claim relating to a project for a state or federal government, then you likely have Miller or Little Miller Act payment bond rights. While 2nd tier subcontractors are required to give notice to the General Contractor and the bonding company of a potential claim, I find that the best practice is to notify these two companies regardless of the statutory necessity. Again, the end game is getting paid and any such notice can put pressure on a party that isn’t paying you. Such pressure can be brought to bear regardless of your “tier” on a project.

Finally, if neither of these options is open, sometimes a stern yet polite letter from your attorney can at least get the ball rolling toward payment.

Next week: The Last Straw, a/k/a litigation or arbitration.

As always, I welcome your comments below. Please subscribe to keep up with this and other Construction Law Musings.

Print Friendly
Send to Kindle
2 Responses to The Anatomy of a Construction Dispute Stage 2- Increase the Heat
  1. […] I’ve discussed three “stages” of a construction dispute from the claim, to how to increase the pressure for payment, to the litigation. While these three steps are all too often necessary tools in your […]

  2. […] The Anatomy of a Construction Dispute Stage 2- Increase the Heat- This post discussed various methods to increase the heat on the party with whom you have a claim prior to litigation or arbitration. […]

Leave a Reply

Wanting to leave an <em>phasis on your comment?

CommentLuv badge

About Musings

I am a construction lawyer in Richmond, Virginia, a LEED AP, and have been nominated by my peers to Virginia's Legal Elite in Construction Law on multiple occasions. I provide advice and assistance with mechanic's liens, contract review and consulting, occupational safety issues (VOSH and OSHA), and risk management for construction professionals.

Please join the conversation!

More About Musings
Creative Commons License