<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: E-Mail Can Waive Arbitration (sometimes)- A Cautionary Tale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://constructionlawva.com/email-can-waive-arbitration-sometimes-cautionary-tale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://constructionlawva.com/email-can-waive-arbitration-sometimes-cautionary-tale/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the construction landscape from Christopher G. Hill, Virginia construction lawyer, LEED AP and member of the Virginia Legal Elite in Construction Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 09:22:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: Daniela</title>
		<link>http://constructionlawva.com/email-can-waive-arbitration-sometimes-cautionary-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-3805</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 22:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructionlawva.com/?p=2875#comment-3805</guid>
		<description>Email is great for just that reason, that there is a &quot;paper&quot; trail to the conversation. You&#039;d think by now that people would get used to that fact. It&#039;s interesting here that it seems like the parties tried to solve this problem themselves, and then reneged to the courts. What counts as a final signature on an email contract in a case like this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Email is great for just that reason, that there is a &#8220;paper&#8221; trail to the conversation. You&#8217;d think by now that people would get used to that fact. It&#8217;s interesting here that it seems like the parties tried to solve this problem themselves, and then reneged to the courts. What counts as a final signature on an email contract in a case like this?<br />
<span class="cluv">Daniela recently posted..<a class="bd76f968a3 3805" rel="nofollow" href="http://blog.neenan.com/?p=1925">Tweeting Greenbuild 2010</a><span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip  3805" alt="My Profile" style="border:0" width="16" height="14" src="http://constructionlawva.com/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher G. Hill</title>
		<link>http://constructionlawva.com/email-can-waive-arbitration-sometimes-cautionary-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-3090</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher G. Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 22:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructionlawva.com/?p=2875#comment-3090</guid>
		<description>I agree Melissa, e-mail almost makes it seem informal enough to make it a converation and not a written record</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Melissa, e-mail almost makes it seem informal enough to make it a converation and not a written record</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa Brumback</title>
		<link>http://constructionlawva.com/email-can-waive-arbitration-sometimes-cautionary-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-3089</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Brumback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 22:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructionlawva.com/?p=2875#comment-3089</guid>
		<description>Concerning enforcement of email agreements, it always seems to shock otherwise sophisticated businesspeople to learn that their &quot;casual&quot; communications can change rights and obligations of the parties.  Another plug to always run these things by your experienced attorney to review first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concerning enforcement of email agreements, it always seems to shock otherwise sophisticated businesspeople to learn that their &#8220;casual&#8221; communications can change rights and obligations of the parties.  Another plug to always run these things by your experienced attorney to review first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher G. Hill</title>
		<link>http://constructionlawva.com/email-can-waive-arbitration-sometimes-cautionary-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-3084</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher G. Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructionlawva.com/?p=2875#comment-3084</guid>
		<description>Thanks for checking in Tim. I agree with the judge also, especially in the age of texts and e-mails. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for checking in Tim. I agree with the judge also, especially in the age of texts and e-mails. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy R. Hughes</title>
		<link>http://constructionlawva.com/email-can-waive-arbitration-sometimes-cautionary-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-3083</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy R. Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 01:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructionlawva.com/?p=2875#comment-3083</guid>
		<description>Very interesting case Chris.  

The really interesting piece to me is using e-mails with no signed agreement to demonstrate a settlement agreement.  Ultimately I agree with the judge - if the e-mails are enough to demonstrate an agreement, then their terms should stick.

That is a good case to share!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting case Chris.  </p>
<p>The really interesting piece to me is using e-mails with no signed agreement to demonstrate a settlement agreement.  Ultimately I agree with the judge &#8211; if the e-mails are enough to demonstrate an agreement, then their terms should stick.</p>
<p>That is a good case to share!<br />
<span class="cluv">Timothy R. Hughes recently posted..<a class="dfd318cacd 3083" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/VirginiaRealEstateLandUseConstructionLaw/~3/Q1Qlj7flXYA/">Virginia Transportation Stimulus Spending- Dead Last and Slow as Molasses</a><span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip  3083" alt="My Profile" style="border:0" width="16" height="14" src="http://constructionlawva.com/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E-Mail Can Waive Arbitration (sometimes- A Cautionary Tale &#8211; the impact of engineering)</title>
		<link>http://constructionlawva.com/email-can-waive-arbitration-sometimes-cautionary-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-3080</link>
		<dc:creator>E-Mail Can Waive Arbitration (sometimes- A Cautionary Tale &#8211; the impact of engineering)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructionlawva.com/?p=2875#comment-3080</guid>
		<description>[...] Construction Law Musings- Richmond, VA [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Construction Law Musings- Richmond, VA [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: imadnaffa (Imad Naffa)</title>
		<link>http://constructionlawva.com/email-can-waive-arbitration-sometimes-cautionary-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-3074</link>
		<dc:creator>imadnaffa (Imad Naffa)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 14:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructionlawva.com/?p=2875#comment-3074</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Twitter Comment&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/imadnaffa&quot; title=&quot;Twitter Comment&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;ccimg1&quot; title=&quot;imadnaffa (Imad Naffa)&quot; style=&quot;float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:60px;height:60px;&quot;&gt;
&lt;img name=&quot;cc_image&quot; title=&quot;imadnaffa (Imad Naffa)&quot; style=&quot;float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:50px;height:50px;&quot; src=&quot;http://purl.org/net/spiurl/imadnaffa&quot;/&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
New Musings: E-Mail Can Waive Arbitration (sometimes)- A Cautionary Tale [link to post] /via @constructionlaw&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://chatcatcher.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Posted using Chat Catcher&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Twitter Comment</strong><br />
<a href="http://twitter.com/imadnaffa" title="Twitter Comment" rel="nofollow"></p>
<div class="ccimg1" title="imadnaffa (Imad Naffa)" style="float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:60px;height:60px;">
<img name="cc_image" title="imadnaffa (Imad Naffa)" style="float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:50px;height:50px;" src="http://purl.org/net/spiurl/imadnaffa"/>
</div>
<p></a><br />
New Musings: E-Mail Can Waive Arbitration (sometimes)- A Cautionary Tale [link to post] /via @<a href="http://twitter.com/constructionlaw" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" title="View constructionlaw's Twitter Profile">constructionlaw</a></p>
<p> &#8211; <a href="http://chatcatcher.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Posted using Chat Catcher</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

