Comments on: Mechanic’s Liens and Contracts: A Roundup

By: Christopher G. Hill

Christopher G. Hill — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:11:43 +0000

Thanks, I appreciate it.

By: Bathroom Taps

Bathroom Taps — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 18:37:38 +0000

Wow great post. Very interesting thanks for taking the time to write this. I will be sure to recommend your blog to friends!

Kim x

By: Christopher G. Hill

Christopher G. Hill — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 20:36:07 +0000

Thanks Tim,

I’m glad it was at least floated.

By: Tim Hughes

Tim Hughes — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 20:21:32 +0000

Chris — got an update on the BP v. Urban case. “Lack of improvement” was indeed, as expected, raised directly as a lien defense. The claimant refused to stipulate there were no improvements. The court found that piece was an evidentiary question and refused to address it on Friday motions day in Fairfax. The case has apparently resolved since then.

By: LeighMonette (Leigh Monette)

LeighMonette (Leigh Monette) — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 17:07:34 +0000

Twitter Comment

@constructionlaw You're welcome Chris - thanks for sharing.

- Posted using Chat Catcher

By: Twitter Trackbacks for Mechanic’s Liens and Contracts: A Roundup | Construction Law Musings- Richmond, VA [constructionlawva.com] on Topsy.com

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:17:05 +0000

[...] Mechanic’s Liens and Contracts: A Roundup | Construction Law Musings- Richmond, VA constructionlawva.com/mechanics-liens-and-contracts-a-roundup – view page – cached A discussion of three construction related cases about arbitration, mechanic's liens and Virginia contract law. — From the page [...]

By: constructionlaw (Christopher Hill)

constructionlaw (Christopher Hill) — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:42:12 +0000

Twitter Comment

@LeighMonette Thanks for the RT Leigh!

- Posted using Chat Catcher