Tag: fraud

Construction Construction Law Contracts

Yet Another Reminder that Tort and Contract Don’t Mix

I have stated on numerous occasions here at Musings that in Virginia, contract claims and tort claims (read fraud) don’t mix.  A recent case from the Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia presents another example of this principle.  In Itility LLC v. The Staffing Resource Group, Judge Ellis of the Alexandria Division, […]

Bond Claims Construction Law Contracts

More on Fraud, Opinions and Contracts

Originally posted 2013-09-20 09:00:39. Here at Construction Law Musings, I have discussed the interaction between fraud and contracts on many occasions.  Recently, I got to put my advice into action.  I am counsel for the plaintiff in the matter of Environmental Staffing Acquisition Corp. v. Beamon, et. al. in the Portsmouth, VA Circuit Court and […]

Construction Construction Law Contracts

Do Construction Contracts and Fraud Mix After All?

On several occasions here at Construction Law Musings, I’ve discussed the fact that, with a few exceptions, fraud claims and written construction contract based claims do not mix. One of the exceptions to the so called “economic loss rule” that would seem to preclude both fraud and contract claims in the same lawsuit is where […]

Business of Construction Construction Law

Be Careful With Construction Fraud Allegations

Here at Construction Law Musings we have discussed the intersection of contracts, construction and fraud on several occasions.  We’ve even discussed how such fraud can bleed over from the civil to the criminal. Recently, the Virginia Supreme Court weighed in again on the question of construction fraud and criminal allegations.  In O’Connor v. Tice, the […]

Construction Law Contracts

Sometimes Fraud and Construction Contracts Mix

As I have discussed at Musings on several occasions, the general rule in Virginia is that fraud and construction contracts do not mix.  In other words, most of the time, even where a contractor clearly misrepresents the work performed, an owner can only recover in contract, and not for fraud with its potential for punitive […]

Back To Top