Thoughts on construction law from Christopher G. Hill, Virginia construction lawyer, LEED AP, mediator, and member of the Virginia Legal Elite in Construction Law

Accounting for Payments on Projects Became Even More Crucial This Year

money photoI discussed several of the statutory changes affecting the construction industry here at Construction Law Musings in the run-up to July 1, 2020.  One of those changes, an amendment to Virginia Code Section 43-13, may add another arrow to the collection quiver of subcontractors and suppliers.  As part of the previously-linked rundown, I highlighted one of the big additions in 2020, namely the amendment making those pesky clauses that let those up the payment chain from you hold money on “this or any other project” void as against public policy.

The other big addition to 43-13 is the change that adds a possible civil cause of action for downstream and unpaid subcontractors and suppliers in the event that funds paid to a general contractor or subcontractor are not first used to pay their downstream contractors and suppliers.  Prior to July 1, 2020, this statute provided criminal penalties for such behavior but did not contain the possibility of a civil penalty.  The operative language for the change is as follows:

The use by any such contractor or subcontractor or any officer, director, or employee of such contractor or subcontractor of any moneys paid under the contract before paying all amounts due or to become due for labor performed or material furnished for such building or structure for any other purpose than paying such amounts due on the project shall be prima facie evidence of intent to defraud. Any breach or violation of this section may give rise to a civil cause of action for a party in contract with the general contractor or subcontractor, as appropriate; however, this right does not affect a contractor’s or subcontractor’s right to withhold payment for failure to properly perform labor or furnish materials on the project.

In short, now there is even more incentive for construction companies to keep track of their payments on a job-by-job basis.  Where in my experience very few Commonwealth’s Attorneys in Virginia were enthusiastic about prosecuting violators under Va. Code 43-13, I believe that this potential civil penalty will be a bigger “club” because subcontractors and suppliers will have another way to get paid.

Of course, I always recommend that you consult an experienced Virginia construction attorney for help interpreting your rights under this or any other part of the mechanic’s lien statutory scheme.

As always, I welcome your comments below. Please subscribe to keep up with this and other Construction Law Musings.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.