A Lien By Any Other Name Can Sound Just As Sweet

Originally posted 2014-08-04 09:00:11.

For this weeks Guest Post Friday here at Musings, we have our first three time guest poster.  Scott Wolfe, Jr. (@scottwolfejr on Twitter) is a construction lawyer practicing in Washington, Oregon and Louisiana.   He is the founding member of the bi-coastal construction law boutique practice, Wolfe Law Group.  He is also the founder of Express Lien, a nationwide lien service that offers a free web-based preliminary notice and lien management software.  Check out his great blogs on various areas of construction law.

Nearly everyone in the construction industry has heard the term “lien” thrown around on a project.   Depending on the type of project being constructed, however, the lien-like remedies available to you may differ significantly.

This post discusses the types of lien or claim remedies available to contractors, suppliers and laborers on the three classes of construction projects:  private, state and federal.   This post discusses the concepts broadly, and does not focus on the law of any particular state.   Remember that laws differ from state-to-state, and it’s important to consult the laws applicable to your project.

The Lien – Private Works

When you think of the term “lien,” you are likely thinking of the remedy available to unpaid parties on a private construction project.

In most states, when a party provides labor and/or materials to an improvement, and the party is not paid, the law allows that party to file a lien on the property itself and claim a privilege thereon (similar to a mortgage privilege held by a bank on mortgaged property).

This is the key difference between a private lien and a public claim.    Unlike most public claims, a private lien actually gives the unpaid party a privilege upon the property.  Most states then allow the lien claimant to bring a proceeding against the property owner to foreclose on the lien (and thus, the property).

To acquire this powerful privilege, many states require contractors to send pre-lien notices.   The notice may be due before work begins or immediately thereafter, and other notices may be due immediately before filing the lien itself.

The first step to knowing the notice requirements in your state, however, is knowing the type of lien you’ll file on a project.   It’s something you’ll want to understand from the start of your work.

Claims on State Projects

Most states do not allow “liens” to be taken against property owned by the state.   Accordingly, the traditional “lien” that can be filed on a private work cannot be filed on a public work.

However, this does not leave unpaid contractors, suppliers and laborers without a remedy.

Normally, a state project will require the general contractor to post a bond in an amount sufficient to pay for the claims of all subcontractors, laborers and suppliers.    In the event you’re unpaid on a state project, most states allow the unpaid party to file a claim against that bond.

Usually, this process is referred to as filing a claim, as opposed to filing a lien.

Three key things to keep in mind when working on a state project:

(1) Like a private lien, state projects may also require you to send pre-claim notices, so familiarize yourself with those requirements;

(2) Like a private lien, you will only have so long to assert your claim against the bond, so do it timely; and

(3) It’s important to know the name of the surety and the public entity in charge of the work, as you’ll be required to notify these parties of your claim.   Have this information from the start of construction, or request it from the general (you’re entitled to know).

Claims on Federal Projects

Like property owned by the state, property owned by the federal government cannot be liened.  Unpaid contractors, suppliers and laborers must bring a claim against the general contractor’s bond, through what is referred to as a “Miller Act Claim.”

To make a claim under the Miller Act, first tier subs and suppliers must bring suit against the bond within 1 year from last furnishing labor and/or materials, and must deliver notice to the owner and/or surety.   Second tier subs and suppliers to first tier subs must deliver a Miller Act Notice to the prime contractor within 90 days from last furnishing labor and/or materials to the project, and a suit must be brought within 1 year of last furnishing labor and/or materials.

Again, as it is true with state projects, it’s important to know the name of the surety and the public entity in charge of the work.   If it’s not provided to you, you can request it.

Conclusion

Regardless of what class of project you’re working on, a lien-like remedy is probably available to you in the event of non-payment.   However, it’s critical to understand the different remedies available at the onset of construction, for each remedy carries different pre-lien or pre-claim requirements.

As always, both Scott and I encourage your comments below.  I also encourage you to subscribe to keep up with this and other Guest Post Fridays at Construction Law Musings.

Proper Notice Can “Accelerate” Your Recovery

Originally posted 2012-07-02 09:00:23.

Map of the United States District Courts in Vi...
Map of the United States District Courts in Virginia (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

I have discussed the importance of every word in a construction contract on multiple occasions at Construction Law Musings.  The United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia recently gave another reminder that one area that can act as a sword or shield in a contract is the language regarding provision of notice.

Continue reading Proper Notice Can “Accelerate” Your Recovery

Back Posting with Thoughts on Lien Waivers

Originally posted 2015-05-18 09:00:46.

The seals of the Commonwealth of Virginia (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

After a week of being unable to post due to the rigors of my solo construction practice, I’m back on the blogging train.  For those of you that missed my new musings this past week, I hope that you had a chance to look through some of the past Guest Post Friday posts for some good stuff to read.

During the course of my busy week last week, a question came up regarding the mechanic’s lien waivers that commercial construction companies routinely execute as part of the payment process.  The waiver forms vary, but each essentially states that in exchange for payment the payee, whether a subcontractor or supplier (or even general contractor) waives its future rights to record a mechanic’s lien for the work that is covered by the payment received.  Most if not all of these forms further require a certification that the funds paid will either be used to pay suppliers or that suppliers have already been paid.  This general description is not the reason for this post.

Continue reading Back Posting with Thoughts on Lien Waivers

Thanks to Construction Law in NC

Originally posted 2012-09-20 12:00:31.

I am always grateful for the opportunity to “muse” on other folks blogs.  I am particularly grateful to Melissa Brumback (@melissabrumback) for the opportunity to discuss why contractors and subcontractors should “play nicely in the sandbox” at the great Construction Law in North Carolina blog.

Here’s an excerpt from the post.  For the rest, you’ll have to go visit her blog.

While it is obvious that subs need to play nice with GC’s because they have the money, it may seem less obvious how the above can hurt a general contractor.  The short answer (and don’t worry I won’t be going into the long one) is that burning good subs eventually means that good subs won’t work with you.  Subs talk to each other.  Your reputation will precede you.  Eventually the economy will improve and you won’t be the only game in town.  Not to mention that such actions are the stuff of which claims are made.

I recommend that you check out the post and the remainder of Melissa’s great blog, particularly if you are a North Carolina construction or AE professional.

I welcome your comments below.  Please subscribe to keep up with this and other Construction Law Musings.

Reminder: Second Tier Subcontractors Have Miller Act Claim

Originally posted 2013-02-11 09:00:06.

English: Alexandria, Virginia U.S. Custom House and Post Office (1900)

Here at Construction Law Musings, we often discuss the Federal Miller Act and its Virginia equivalent (the “Little Miller Act“).  These two statutes provide subcontractors on government projects (on which no mechanic’s lien can attach) the protection of payment and performance bonds.

One question that often arises in this context is which subs can claim against the payment bond.  Recently, the Eastern District of Virginia District Court affirmed that a second tier subcontractor has the right to claim against a payment bond under the Federal Miller Act.  In U.S. ex rel IGW Electric LLC v. Scarborough, the Virginia federal court considered the claim of an electrical “sub-subcontractor” which held a contract with the subcontractor to build cottages in Norfolk, Virginia for the U. S. Navy.

Continue reading Reminder: Second Tier Subcontractors Have Miller Act Claim

Exit mobile version